 |
| CashBox, March 14, 1992, p. 3 |
Sources about the brief life of the CD Longbox. Presented for informational purposes only.
Showing posts with label 92-03. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 92-03. Show all posts
1992, March 20
Shrinking the CD Box
By Fred Goodman
Published March 20, 1992 in Entertainment Weekly
In the game of the CD packaging, the score is now: environmentalists 1, record retailers 0. After years of intensifying pressure from ecological activists, artists, and consumers, the recording industry has vowed to scrap the larger packages in which most compact discs are sold. By April 1993, CDs will no longer come wrapped in the oversize cardboard ”longboxes” most people promptly throw away. No single design has been chosen to replace the longbox, but the new packages cannot be larger than a jewel box, a hard plastic container that comes inside longboxes now.
Read the rest: http://www.ew.com/article/1992/03/20/shrinking-cd-box
By Fred Goodman
Published March 20, 1992 in Entertainment Weekly
In the game of the CD packaging, the score is now: environmentalists 1, record retailers 0. After years of intensifying pressure from ecological activists, artists, and consumers, the recording industry has vowed to scrap the larger packages in which most compact discs are sold. By April 1993, CDs will no longer come wrapped in the oversize cardboard ”longboxes” most people promptly throw away. No single design has been chosen to replace the longbox, but the new packages cannot be larger than a jewel box, a hard plastic container that comes inside longboxes now.
Read the rest: http://www.ew.com/article/1992/03/20/shrinking-cd-box
1992, March 11
U.S. will join rest of world in offering Compact Discs in boxes they will be stored in for use, eliminating wasteful and annoying longbox. RIAA's announcement that member companies have chosen shrink-wrapped jewel box as "voluntary" standard for use by April 1993 was greeted by NARM complaints that selling in smaller package invites thievery and that CD displays will have to be redesigned.
source: Communications Daily, March 11, 1992, Wednesday, Vol. 12, No. 48; Pg. 6
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)